USNews.com - Efforts to fight Internet regulation scored a major victory yesterday, as the Supreme Court rejected the Bush administration’s appeal of a 3rd Circuit decision that overturned the Child Online Protection Act. COPA, fi required owners of websites with “material harmful to minors” to take it upon themselves to prevent minors from getting access to their sites. The 3rd Circuit, however, ruled that it unnecessarily tramples on the First Amendment to place the burden on the website operators, when tools for parents to control what their children see online exist. Jack Balkin explains:
Not all parents are alike and not all children are alike; different parents might want to block different things. Some might decide not to block access at all but supervise and educate their children about Internet use in other ways. Without criminalizing website operations, the market can produce webservers and browsers to facilitate parental choice, as well third party software solutions, many of which already exist.
Generally speaking, the Internet should place filtering decisions and responsibilities on the end user, not the publisher of the content. There are exceptions to this basic rule, but sexually explicit speech is not one of them.
Read the rest of this entry »
